Barack Obama could theoretically file a libel lawsuit against Donald Trump based on Supreme Court precedent

226


MSNBC’s Phil McCausland, Ari Melber, and Diana Marinaccio asked an important question about President Trump’s unfounded claims that then-President Obama wire-tapped Trump Tower: Does Obama have grounds to sue Trump for Libel?

The answer is fascinating, and continues to be relevant, since Trump continues to recycle the same conspiracy theories from the 2016 election cycle still today.

Image via Barack Obama’s Instagram

The trio calls the accusation Trump has levied “watergate-level,” and has flat out said – unequivocally – that Obama was behind a sinister wire-tap aimed at the Trump Team.

And while Trump may have likely tweeted tirades just to deflect a little bit of the Russian-scandal attention away from him, it could actually turn out to create a much more serious legal problem.

Image via Barack Obama’s Instagram

And it could drag his post-presidency into even darker realms of powerlessness…

MSNBC points out that there is a great deal of leeway regarding political speech in all its forms, but by launching these serious accusations as fact, calling him “bad (or sick) guy,” and doing so without any kind of evidence whatsoever, he could land himself in some seriously hot water.

Flickr / Gage Skidmore / https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/

Fordham University Law Professor Benjamin Zipursky shared his thoughts on the matter to MSNBC

“He’s basically stating that Mr. Obama committed crimes, and to state that somebody has committed a crime when it’s false is clearly defamatory.

Flickr / Michael Vadon / https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

The question is: Is there enough evidence of serious reckless disregard to send that case to a jury? I don’t know what a court would decide on that, but there is some evidence of recklessness.”

The Supreme Court has set the bar high for libel:

  • Was the statement false?
  • Did the person know it was false or was he or she reckless about whether it was false?
Donald Trump Rally 10/21/16” by Michael Candelori Photography is licensed with CC BY 2.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

These questions difficult to definitively prove. And yet it is possible that there is proof.

MSNBC points out that that task is perhaps growing easier as more people speak out against Trump’s evidence-less claims.

Donald Trump” by Gage Skidmore is licensed with CC BY-SA 2.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/

Former FBI Director, James Comey, asked the Justice Department to “publicly reject” Trump’s accusations, and the former Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, said that Trump’s claims were “unequivocally false.”

Add to that the fact that a senior US official made it clear that Trump tweeted the accusations without first consulting with anyone in any government capacity.

Donald Trump” by Gage Skidmore is licensed with CC BY-SA 2.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/

This throws fuel to the fire, because it would show Trump was more interested in slandering Obama than he is with fact-checking, which falls in line with his typical MO.

MSNBC concluded its study explaining the conundrum and the possibilities:

Flickr / Gage Skidmore / https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/

“Despite the possible case, it is unlikely that Obama would sue Trump for libel. Predecessors tend to give the succeeding president a fair amount of room…

The Supreme Court’s 1982 decision Nixon v. Fitzgerald found that a president is provided absolute immunity from civil damages and liability while conducting presidential acts.

“Donald Trump,” by US Department of State is licensed with CC BY-NC 2.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/

‘President Trump has official immunity from liability and damages,’ Zipursky confirmed, but it is not clear that judges would view tweeting a defamatory conspiracy theory, without evidence, as a president carrying out his official duties.”

Of course, all of this changes relevancy when considering he is no longer afforded the same protections he had while president.

Will Obama sue Trump? We’ll see.

The post Barack Obama could theoretically file a libel lawsuit against Donald Trump based on Supreme Court precedent first appeared on TPL News.



Source link

You might also like
Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.