InterServer Web Hosting and VPS

Dershowitz Rails Against Supreme Court’s Abortion Ruling

203


Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz castigated the Supreme Court on Fox News Friday after it struck down Roe v. Wade earlier in the day. He denounced the court’s decision as “judicial activism.”

In its opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the court ruled the 1973 case was wrongly decided and that there is no constitutional right to abortion.

At issue in the opinion issued Friday was a Mississippi law banning abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy. Dershowitz stated that the court overstepped its authority by deciding on a question that was not before the court.

“I do think the Supreme Court should never have had to reach beyond the 15 weeks. That’s what was before the Supreme Court,” Dershowitz told Sean Hannity. “Why did the Supreme Court have to jump into this and say, ‘We’re not going to decide the case before us. We’re going to ban Roe vs. Wade, overrule it, and allow states… to abolish abortion completely’? That was judicial activism, overreaching. And Sean, you oppose judicial activism.”

Dershowitz stated the court should have waited for a case in which a state banned abortion entirely.

“And then the Supreme Court could’ve overruled Roe v. Wade,” he said.

Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett disagreed, stating, “There is nothing in the text or the structure or the meaning of the Constitution that gives rise to this right to privacy for an abortion. It is neither explicit nor is it implicit.”

Jarrett accused the court in 1973 of having “conjured up out of thin air this right to privacy” and noted that even landmark cases have been overturned.

“But in all those cases the Supreme Court waited until they had an actual case before it which raised the issue,” Dershowitz replied. “This case – the Mississippi case – did not raise that issue. It only raised the issue of whether a 15-week ban was constitutional. It would have been much better to decide that.”

Jarrett responded, “There is nothing wrong with being proactive and examining the basis upon which the case is being litigated–”

“It’s called judicial activism,” Dershowitz shot back.

Watch above via Fox News.

Have a tip we should know? tips@mediaite.com





Source link

You might also like
Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.