InterServer Web Hosting and VPS

Amber Heard’s Attorney Has Requested That The Johnny Depp Defamation Trial Verdict Be Thrown Out

24


All the Jack Sparrow-obsessed #JusticeForJohnnyDepp hash-taggers on social media had reason to celebrate last month when a Virginia court declared that in the case of Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard, Johnny’s name had been defamed just a bit more than Amber’s had, and awarded Johnny a $10,350,000 victory in damages. It has been said that Amber doesn’t exactly have the cash to cut her ex-husband a check, which is bad news for Johnny’s bank account, which has reportedly been in a bad way for years now. And if Amber’s legal team has their way, all those Johnny fans won’t even have their precious gloating at the end of all this. Because Amber’s attorney filed to have the verdict tossed, and is accusing the trial of failing to produce actual evidence of defamation, and is calling for an investigation into a juror that might not have been properly vetted by the court.

As you’ll recall, Johnny decided to sue Amber for defamation after The Washington Post posted an op-ed written by Amber, in which she spoke about the aftermath of being open and public about her personal experience with domestic violence. And that jury did believe that Johnny’s name was defamed enough to entitle him to $10 million in compensatory damages and the Virginia state maximum of $350,000 punitive damages. Amber herself was awarded $2 million in damages. Still, Amber’s side is trying to argue that nobody technically proved any kind of defamation happened during that trial. via Entertainment Weekly:

Heard’s attorneys argue that the verdict is not supported by evidence. The document, submitted to the Fairfax County Circuit Court, also argues that Depp did not present evidence of actual malice or defamation. Depp “proceeded solely on a defamation by implication theory, abandoning any claims that Ms. Heard’s statements were actually false,” Heard’s attorneys argued in the motion. In response, Benjamin Chew, Depp’s lead attorney, dismissed the motion as “what we expected, just longer, no more substantive.”

After Johnny emerged as the most defamed during that long defamation trial, Amber’s side made it clear that they planned to appeal the verdict. And appeal they are! They’re bringing more than one argument to the table as to why that trial should be declared null and void. In fact, Amber’s legal team is tossing out arguments that conflict with previous statements. For example, remember when Amber gave her first official interview after the verdict was announced, and she said that she didn’t blame the jury for the outcome of the trial? Well, her lawyers are kind of blaming at least one member of the jury for maybe not following the whole truth and nothing but the truth vibe of court. According to Amber’s attorney, that one specific juror was masquerading as a person in their 70s when in actuality they might have been born in the 70s. via Entertainment Weekly:

It calls for an investigation of “improper juror service,” claiming there was a public information discrepancy in the birth year listed for one of the jurors. That juror, identified in the filing as Juror 15, had a listed birth year of 1945, but “publicly available information” indicates a birth year of 1970. The motion adds that the juror was “clearly born later than 1945.”

“This discrepancy raises the question whether Juror 15 actually received a summons for jury duty and was properly vetted by the court to serve on the jury,” Heard’s attorneys posit. The Aquaman actress’ attorneys have thus asked the court to set aside the verdict in Depp’s favor, dismiss the complaint, or order a new trial.

Amber’s attorney doesn’t hypothesize how Juror 15 got into court, but let’s just assume the most logical explanation here: that a Twitter user who goes by the name of @Johnnys#1FanForLife walked into court one day, declared they were super siked about getting called for jury duty, and then pulled a Mrs. Doubtfire when asked their age by struggling to remember the year of their birth, and the only thing their brain could come up with was the four-to-five drive-thru egg sandwiches they ate on the way over.

Not to mention that this is made all the more strange when you remember that some of the jury members were reportedly falling asleep during the trial. To be fair, trying to remember how old you claimed to be on a juror application form sounds exhausting.

Pic: INSTARimages





Source link

You might also like
Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.